Here you can ask, answer and find questions surrounding the topic: arriving in Germany
My citizenship/country is Not on the "safe list" of countries, but would be regarded by many as "safe".

Aside from my own history of events, what supportive documentation should I seek and be able to present to demonstrate the general oppression and tyranny of the state/government.

Thanks.

Rüdiger
asked Nov 8, 2018 in Legal advice by Rüdiger

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

0 votes
Dear @Rüdiger, thank you for your question in the community. As for your questions: 1. for an asykum case and refugee case its your personal life and the danger you personally facing considered; 2. but under some circumstances such as war, and public tyranny will be applied in order for you to get temporary protection; 3. however anything that you will be addressing have to effecting your life and be a danger to it. I hope we could address your questions, if further questions arise please do not hesitate to contact us in the community. Best regards, Nilab
answered Nov 9, 2018 by Nilab
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I perhaps should have mentioned that I am not seeking asylum as a refugee, but would rather be seeking Constitution asylum, most likely in France, since that is the country which actually has codified it in it's own Constitution. Germany and Italy remain the two other countries which, historically, have recognized this kind of application for patriots defending their own Constitutional rights.
I am a citizen of the United States.
My understanding is that the first legal hurtle would be establish that the causeof my circumstances is an abrogation of a basic Constitutional right [in this case, property] which is being systematically and universally applied. Actually, before I can begin to argue my own unique defense, and the history of events as a direct consequence, this universal injustice [tyranny of judiciary process and action/not warfare] has to be established.
My application will be dismissed outright if I'm regarded as coming from a "safe country", and I am really seeking to avoid an appeals process from the beginning.
Thanks.
-R
Dear @Rüdiger, thank you for the clearification. "My understanding is that the first legal hurtle would be establish that the causeof my circumstances is an abrogation of a basic Constitutional right [in this case, property] which is being systematically and universally applied. Actually, before I can begin to argue my own unique defense, and the history of events as a direct consequence, this universal injustice [tyranny of judiciary process and action/not warfare] has to be established." It would be first importnat to proof why the United States is not safe for you, desoite the fcat that it is a safe country. After having established that you then can actually go and argue your case. Though there is no war in the United States it diesnt mean you could not apply and being granted asylum. But theburden of proof lies on you and the danger you are facing or the violation of your fundamental rights have to be evident as well. Further you would have to proof that you exhausted the legal instruments in the United States. I hope this help you with your questions, however I would suggst to you to get an assistance by a lawyer as your case seems to be more complex. Best regards, Nilab
Thank you very much for taking my inquiry seriously, and your helpful reply.
I do have medical records, and the issue of "refoulment'. Had already been two years awaiting trial in the US before leaving. Publication of my arrest on Google prevented my getting employment, after having been made homeless.
Would the "right to be forgotten" established by French law be considered a universal right?
Thanks again.
-RCW
2,228 questions
2,786 answers
4,116 comments
96,098 users